¶ Nunn Backed Trump’s Costly War With Iran That Raised Prices On Iowans
¶ Nunn defended Trump’s war with iran, claimed the loss of iowa loves was worth it
Nunn Told Iowans At A Rally That The War In Iran Was Worth High Gas Prices And The Loss Of Iowan Soldiers. According to the Des Moines Register, "Addressing the rallygoers, Nunn told the crowd those families gave ‘the ultimate sacrifice’ and acknowledged Iowa bears a disproportionate share of the loss of American servicemembers in the conflict. Nunn said Iowans are ‘hurting at the loss’ and also feeling the sting of higher costs at the gas pump, but the sacrifice was worth it to preserve America's energy independence and national security from nations such as Iran. ‘Hearing from those Gold Star families, they knew that it was worth it — and when we go to bed every night, we’re a little safer because of what their kids did for us,’ Nunn said." [Des Moines Register, 5/6/26]
Nunn Claimed The U.S. Was In A “Much Safer Spot” Than Before The Conflict With Iran Began Because Iran’s Nuclear Capacities Were Reduced. According to the Des Moines Register, "Nunn said the U.S. is in a ‘much safer spot’ than when the conflict started in February with reduced capacities to immediately build a nuclear weapon and fund terrorist groups. ‘Iran is in a weaker state than it's ever been,’ Nunn said. ‘After 47 years of conflict, every president has talked about holding Iran accountable. This administration, this Congress, have done that, and we got to make sure moving forward, we continue to hold Iran accountable.’" [Des Moines Register, 6/19/26]
Nunn Defended Operation “Epic Fury” By Saying It Was A Direct Response To Iran’s Refusal To Agree To Abandon Its Efforts To Build Nuclear Weapons. According to a post on Rep. Zach Nunn’s Twitter, "Iran is the #1 global sponsor of terrorism. Operation Epic Fury is a direct response to the regime's funding of proxy attacks on American forces and allies — and Tehran’s refusal to negotiate in good faith to abandon its decades-long effort to build a nuclear weapon." [Twitter, @ZachNunn, 3/6/26]
¶ Nunn Claimed The Media Was Overhyping The Financial Impact Of The War In Iran On Americans
Nunn Said The Inflationary Effects Of The War In Iran Were “Overhyped” By The Media. According to Politico Pro, "Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Iowa), who is running a hotly contested reelection campaign, acknowledged that cost-of-living issues remain a challenge in his district, but pointed to policy achievements like Republicans’ tax cuts and efforts to increase domestic energy and fertilizer production. ‘We need to have an off-ramp for what's currently going on [in Iran], not only to open up the strait, but more importantly, so that we can focus on, my opinion, the greater national security threats,’ Nunn said, referencing the president’s visit to China. But he said that the inflationary effects of the war are ‘overhyped, candidly, by the media’ noting that the U.S. is a net energy exporter." [Politico Pro, 5/18/26]
¶ Nunn Repeatedly Voted Against Ending the United States’ Hostilities In Iran
¶ July 2026: Nunn Voted Against Removing U.S. Armed Forces From Hostilities Against Iran Unless Explicitly Authorized By A Declaration Of War
2026: Nunn Effectively Voted Against Withdrawing US Troops From Iran. In July 2026 Nunn voted against, according to Congressional Quarterly, “motion to discharge the Foreign Relations Committee from further consideration of the joint resolution that would direct the president to withdraw U.S. armed forces hostilities against Iran not authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for military force.” The vote was on adoption of the resolution. The House adopted the resolution by a vote of 214 to 208. [House Vote 282, 7/23/26; Congressional Quarterly, 7/23/26; Congressional Actions, H.Con.Res.89]
- The Senate Voted Against Ending The War In Iran On The Same Day. According to Congressional Quarterly, “The House and Senate, in votes Thursday on ending the Iran war, came to different conclusions, but the majority of voting members of Congress said it is time to bring U.S. troops home. The House, for the second time, formally called on President Donald Trump to end the war, approving 214-208 a nonbinding concurrent resolution (H Con Res 89) by Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash.” [Congressional Quarterly, 7/23/26]
- The Vote Came After The Trump Administration Declared A Memorandum Of Understanding From The Previous Month “Over”, With Three US Troops Killed The Weekend Before And Houthi Strikes Against Two Saudi Tankers The Day Before. According to Congressional Quarterly, “Last month, the Trump administration announced it had reached a memorandum of understanding with Iran. But less than a month later, Trump declared the MOU ‘over.’ On July 10, he formally notified Congress fighting in the war had resumed. Over the weekend, three U.S. troops were killed in an Iranian attack on a base in Jordan, while a fourth U.S. service member in Iraq died during what was supposed to be a controlled detonation of an unexploded Iranian drone. Iran’s proxy group in Yemen, the Houthis, struck two Saudi tankers in the Red Sea on Wednesday. Such attacks could choke off another bottleneck in the global economy in addition to the ongoing throttling of trade in the Strait of Hormuz as a result of the war.” [Congressional Quarterly, 7/23/26]
¶ June 2026: Nunn Voted Against Removing U.S. Armed Forces From Hostilities Against Iran Unless Explicitly Authorized By A Declaration Of War
6/3/26: Nunn Voted Against Terminating Hostilities Against Iran Without A Declaration Of War. In May 2026, Nunn voted against, according to Congressional Quarterly, “adoption of a resolution that would direct the president to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.” The vote was on passage. The House adopted the resolution by a vote of 215 to 208. [House Vote 199, 6/3/26; Congressional Quarterly, 6/3/26; Congressional Actions, H.Con.Res. 86]
- The Vote Occurred As The War Entered Its Fourth Month, And Was The House’s Fourth Vote On The War As Gas And Food Prices Continued To Rise. According to Congressional Quarterly, “Either way, supporters say the House adopting the resolution sends an important message to Trump that Congress is fed up with the war as it lumbers into its fourth month. ‘We're now past 90 days, there seems to be no end to this war, and folks want some accountability, Democrats and Republicans,’ New York Rep. Gregory W. Meeks, the ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the sponsor of Wednesday’s resolution, said ahead of the vote. ‘The American people are suffering. The cost of gas continues to go up, the cost of food and inflation keeps going up.’ ‘So it's been building and building,’ Meeks added. Wednesday’s vote was the House’s fourth on an Iran war powers resolution since the war started at the end of February, with each vote getting tighter than before. In the third vote last month, the measure was rejected 212-212.” [Congressional Quarterly, 6/3/26]
- The Vote Came Amidst Ongoing Strikes Despite A Proclaimed Ceasefire With Iran Claiming It Was Suspending Talks Following An Israeli Incursion Of Lebanon. According to Congressional Quarterly, “The growing congressional angst over the war comes as an already fragile ceasefire appears increasingly tenuous and the Trump administration’s negotiations with Iran stumble. Early Wednesday morning, Iran launched a missile and drone attack at an airport in Kuwait, killing an Indian national and injuring dozens of other people, in what Tehran described as a response to U.S. strikes on Iran the night before. U.S. Central Command said Iran also targeted U.S. forces in Kuwait but that air defenses shot down the drones and ‘ensured no American personnel or assets were harmed.’ On Tuesday evening, Central Command said it conducted ‘self-defense strike’ on Iran’s Qeshm Island in response to Iran firing missiles and drones toward Kuwait and Bahrain. Hours earlier, Central Command also said U.S. forces fired a Hellfire missile into the engine room of a Botswana-flagged oil tanker that it alleged was trying to evade the U.S. blockade against Iranian ports. The exchange of fire comes amid on-again-off-again talks to end the war. On Monday, Iran said it was suspending talks with the United States in response to Israel’s incursion into Lebanon. But Trump maintained that talks are continuing despite Iran’s statement, posting on Truth Social on Tuesday that ‘the conversations between us have been going on continuously.’” [Congressional Quarterly, 6/3/26]
¶ May 2026: Nunn Voted Against Terminating Hostilities Against Iran Without A Declaration Of War
5/14/26: Nunn Voted Against Terminating Hostilities Against Iran Without A Declaration Of War. In May 2026, Nunn voted against, according to Congressional Quarterly, “the concurrent resolution that would direct the president to terminate the use of U.S. armed forces from hostilities against Iran unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or a specific authorization for use of military force against Iran. It would clarify that nothing in the measure could be construed to disrupt intelligence, counterintelligence or investigative activities.” The vote was on passage. The House rejected the resolution by a vote of 212 to 212. [House Vote 170, 5/14/26; Congressional Quarterly, 5/14/26; Congressional Actions, H.Con.Res. 75]
¶ April 2026: Nunn Voted Against Directing The President To Withdraw Troops From Iran Unless Authorized By Congress
4/16/26: Nunn Voted Against Directing The President To Withdraw Troops From Iran Unless Authorized By Congress. In April 2026, Nunn voted against, according to Congressional Quarterly, “the concurrent resolution that would direct the president to terminate the use of U.S. armed forces from hostilities against Iran unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force against Iran. The measure would exempt the use of U.S. armed forces that may be necessary to defend the U.S. or a U.S. ally or partner from imminent attack.” The vote was on passage. The House rejected the resolution by a vote of 213 to 214. [House Vote 114, 4/16/26; Congressional Quarterly, 4/16/26; Congressional Actions, H.Con.Res.40]
¶ March 2026: Nunn Voted Against Directing President Trump To Withdraw Troops From Iran
3/5/26: Nunn Voted Against Directing President Trump To Withdraw Troops From Iran. In March 2026, Nunn voted against, according to Congressional Quarterly, “the concurrent resolution that would direct the president to terminate the use of U.S. armed forces from hostilities against Iran or any part of its military, unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force against Iran.” The vote was on passage. The House rejected the concurrent resolution by a vote of 212 to 219. [House Vote 85, 3/5/26; Congressional Quarterly, 3/5/26; Congressional Actions, H.Con.Res.38]
¶ The Iran war was costly for Iowans
¶ Regular And Diesel Gas Prices Were Higher For Consumers As A Result Of The War
The Average Iowa Household Has Paid An Extra $516 On Gas Since The Beginning Of Trump’s War With Iran. According to the Iowa Independent, "The average household in Iowa has already paid an extra $516 on gasoline since President Donald Trump began U.S. military attacks against Iran on Feb. 28, according to a new analysis by the minority staff of Congress’ Joint Economic Committee. Nationally, gasoline prices are about 30% higher than before the war began." [Iowa Independent, 7/15/26]
July 2026: The National Average Price For A Gallon Of Gas Was Reaching $4 Again After Trump Declared A Ceasefire Was Over. According to Arizona’s Family, "Gas prices continue to inch up after President Donald Trump declared the ceasefire agreement with Iran was ‘over.’ AAA reported the average price for a gallon of regular gasoline was just shy of $4, at $3.98 a gallon. On Thursday, the average price of diesel was back up to about $5 a gallon. Oil and gas prices had been declining after the U.S. and Iran signed a peace plan to end the war in June." [Arizona’s Family, 7/17/26]
- The War In Iran Caused Fuel Inventories To Plunge To Historic Lows, Leading To A Major Surge In Gas Prices. According to the Washington Post, "Americans face a new round of punishing price increases for fuel and other products as oil and gas inventories plunge to historic lows around the world because of the war in Iran, energy executives and analysts warn. Fuel stocks are so low, experts said, that even an abrupt agreement between the United States and Iran and an immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz — through which one-fifth of the world’s oil and natural gas supplies passed before the war — may not stop fuel prices from soaring anew by the July Fourth holiday." [Washington Post, 6/3/26
7/29/26: Diesel Cost An Average Of $4.97 A Gallon In Iowa.
[AAA, Fuel Prices, viewed 7/29/26]
- HEADLINE: “Diesel Prices Skyrocket As War In Iran Continues.” [The Trucker, 3/11/26]
- HEADLINE: "‘It’s Taking All Of Our Money’: Truck Drivers In Iowa Lament Gas Price Surge Sparked By Trump’s Iran War" [The Guardian, 5/24/26]
Consumers Were Facing Higher Costs Of Airfare Due To The Increased Price Of Fuel For Airlines. According to Arizona’s Family, "The week before the war started, the price of jet fuel was $2.50 a gallon. On Tuesday, April 28, the price is $4.26, according to Airlines for America. ‘I fly Southwest mostly. I was able to get a straight flight home and two from here. It was higher than normal, for sure,’ said Patrick Foy, who was flying from Phoenix to Louisiana. Major airliners have already raised checked baggage fees because of the rising fuel prices, while some of the smaller, budget airlines are asking the federal government for billions of dollars in assistance. ‘It’s obviously frustrating. It affects our family’s budget,’ Foy said. Gas experts have said even when the war in Iran ends, the full relief people see at the pump or when buying a plane ticket will most likely not be immediate." [Arizona’s Family, 4/28/26]
¶ Grocery Prices Were Higher For Iowans Because Of The War With Iran
Tomatoes, Bananas, And Onions Experienced Major Price Hikes Since The Beginning Of The War. According to Fortune, "The U.S., Israel, and Iran agreed to a two-week ceasefire on Tuesday, but the sticker shock you’ve been feeling every time you go to the grocery store will get worse if the war continues. One of the first places you’ll feel it will be the produce aisle, experts say. A Fortune analysis of produce wholesale prices from USDA data found grocery-cart staples such as tomatoes, bananas, and yellow onions have experienced significant price spikes since the war began. The United Nations reported its global food price index rose by 2.4% in March, the second consecutive month of rising prices." [Fortune, 4/8/26]
HEADLINE: "Higher Prices For Gas, Groceries And Flights Will Likely Outlast The Iran War" [AP News, 6/16/26]
¶ The War In Iran Cost U.S. Families $100 Billion So Far
As Of June 2026, The War In Iran Cost U.S. Families $100 Billion So Far. According to Fortune, "$750 a household—or $100 billion. This is the cost that Moody’s has calculated the Iran War has been so far to the U.S. consumer. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, said the cost passed on to households is the result of increased military spending and higher prices as a result of oil supply disruption out of the Middle East. Since the U.S. and Israel launched action against Iran—setting off a domino-effect of attacks across the Middle East—brent crude has topped $110 a barrel on multiple occasions." [Fortune, 6/2/26]
Americans, By A Margin Of 56 Percent To 7 Percent, Expected Trump’s War In Iran To Have A “Mostly Negative Impact” On Their Personal Financial Situation. According to The Washington Post, “Americans, by a margin of 56 percent to 7 percent, expect the war to have a ‘mostly negative impact’ on their personal financial situation, according to a March 31 Ipsos poll. A Middle East conflict that lasts for several more months would almost certainly spread higher prices and supply chain disruption beyond Asia and Europe to American shores. ‘I don’t think the U.S. will avoid it. These are global markets,’ said Rachel Ziemba, a New York-based analyst who advises corporations on geopolitical risk. ‘Experts, even a week ago, were worried. Now they are more worried.’” [Washington Post, 4/4/26]