¶ Overview
Mackenzie claimed to oppose forever wars, but consistently voiced support and voted to support Trump's war with Iran. Mackenzie claimed American leaders had to “confront Iran at some point” and said Trump made the right decisions in Iran “from the get-go,” all while Pennsylvania families were paying an estimated $372 more for gas and staring down rising costs at the grocery store due to Trump's war. Even as his constituents were suffering, Mackenzie voted in lockstep with his Republican colleagues to ensure Trump's war with Iran continued unchecked.
¶ Mackenzie Backed Trump’s Costly War With Iran That Raised Prices For Pennsylvanians
¶ Mackenzie Defended Trump's War With Iran, Claiming Trump Made The Right Decision “From The Get-Go”
February 2026: Mackenzie Defended Trump’s Bombing Of Iran And Claimed The World Would “Become A Safer Place In The Long Run” Due To His Actions. Rep. Ryan Mackenzie tweeted, “For decades, Khamenei has threatened America and killed Americans through the use of the Iranian terror network. After refusing America’s latest diplomatic entreaties, Khamenei and 40 of his top leaders have been killed. The world will become a safer place in the long run because of President Trump’s actions. As our military continues to carry out these major combat operations in Iran, we pray for our service members.”
[Twitter, @RepMackenzie, 2/28/26]
5/1/26: Mackenzie Claimed To Oppose Forever Wars But Said An American Leader Had To “Confront Iran At Some Point.” According to Lehigh Valley News, “Mackenzie ran for office in 2024 saying that America was needed to stop investing lives and funding in so many armed conflicts across the world. While he pledged support for Taiwan and Israel, he called on the United States to withdraw aid from Ukraine and pressure NATO allies to step up their contributions. […] On Monday, Mackenzie said he still holds to those values but credited Trump with seizing a vital opportunity. Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and other high-ranking officials were gathered in a single location, and eliminating them weakened an American adversary that has attacked regional allies and had worked to develop nuclear weapons, he said. ‘You are going to have to confront Iran at some point,’ Mackenzie said. ‘They were on this path to nuclear military capabilities. It would have eventually been inevitable.’” [Lehigh Valley News, 5/1/26]
5/15/26: Mackenzie Said The US “Took The Appropriate Approach” In Iran But “We Do Have To Now Wind This Conflict Down.” According to Rep. Ryan Mackenzie on WFMZ, “HOST: As for the Iran war, MACKENZIE: We certainly don't want another forever war. And that's a lesson that we've learned over many decades in the Middle East in particular. HOST: But believes taking out the Iranian regime was the right thing to do for our national security. Believes had they not, the US could have been targeted for another terrorist attack. MACKENZIE: But I think we took the appropriate approach. Now you're conducting military operations to take out their ballistic military capabilities that they would have responded with and targeted our American interests and our allies in the region. But we do have to now wind this conflict down.” [WFMZ, 5/15/26] (video)
5/18/26: Mackenzie Said Trump Made The Right Decision On Iran “From The Get-Go.” According to Rep. Ryan Mackenzie on WFMZ, “MACKENZIE: Well, first and foremost, we never want to get involved in these forever wars that had been plaguing our country and the international stage for many decades. And so when we look at a situation like this, you really have to look at the decision the president made right from the get-go. And that was, that the Iranians made a terrible mistake. The ayatollah, the senior levels of his leadership were all in the same place at the same time, above ground and in an unsecured facility. And our military found out about that. And so when you have a regime like that that has targeted Americans for 47 years, most recently killing a couple American soldiers in the Middle East, if you have that opportunity as a military, you're going to take out your adversary every single time for national security and to keep our country safe.” [WFMZ, 5/18/26] (video)
¶ Mackenzie Repeatedly Voted Against Ending The United States’ Action In Iran
¶ July 2026: Mackenzie Voted Against Removing U.S. Armed Forces From Hostilities Against Iran Unless Explicitly Authorized By A Declaration Of War
2026: Mackenzie Effectively Voted Against Withdrawing US Troops From Iran. In July 2026 Mackenzie voted against, according to Congressional Quarterly, “motion to discharge the Foreign Relations Committee from further consideration of the joint resolution that would direct the president to withdraw U.S. armed forces hostilities against Iran not authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for military force.” The vote was on adoption of the resolution. The House adopted the resolution by a vote of 214 to 208. [House Vote 282, 7/23/26; Congressional Quarterly, 7/23/26; Congressional Actions, H.Con.Res.89]
- The Senate Voted Against Ending The War In Iran On The Same Day. According to Congressional Quarterly, “The House and Senate, in votes Thursday on ending the Iran war, came to different conclusions, but the majority of voting members of Congress said it is time to bring U.S. troops home. The House, for the second time, formally called on President Donald Trump to end the war, approving 214-208 a nonbinding concurrent resolution (H Con Res 89) by Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash.” [Congressional Quarterly, 7/23/26]
- The Vote Came After The Trump Administration Declared A Memorandum Of Understanding From The Previous Month “Over”, With Three US Troops Killed The Weekend Before And Houthi Strikes Against Two Saudi Tankers The Day Before. According to Congressional Quarterly, “Last month, the Trump administration announced it had reached a memorandum of understanding with Iran. But less than a month later, Trump declared the MOU ‘over.’ On July 10, he formally notified Congress fighting in the war had resumed. Over the weekend, three U.S. troops were killed in an Iranian attack on a base in Jordan, while a fourth U.S. service member in Iraq died during what was supposed to be a controlled detonation of an unexploded Iranian drone. Iran’s proxy group in Yemen, the Houthis, struck two Saudi tankers in the Red Sea on Wednesday. Such attacks could choke off another bottleneck in the global economy in addition to the ongoing throttling of trade in the Strait of Hormuz as a result of the war.” [Congressional Quarterly, 7/23/26]
¶ June 2026: Mackenzie Voted Against Removing U.S. Armed Forces From Hostilities Against Iran Unless Explicitly Authorized By A Declaration Of War
2026: Mackenzie Voted Against Terminating Hostilities Against Iran Without A Declaration Of War. In May 2026, Mackenzie voted against, according to Congressional Quarterly, “adoption of a resolution that would direct the president to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.” The vote was on passage. The House adopted the resolution by a vote of 215 to 208. [House Vote 199, 6/3/26; Congressional Quarterly, 6/3/26; Congressional Actions, H.Con.Res. 86]
- The Vote Occurred As The War Entered Its Fourth Month, And Was The House’s Fourth Vote On The War As Gas And Food Prices Continued To Rise. According to Congressional Quarterly, “Either way, supporters say the House adopting the resolution sends an important message to Trump that Congress is fed up with the war as it lumbers into its fourth month. ‘We're now past 90 days, there seems to be no end to this war, and folks want some accountability, Democrats and Republicans,’ New York Rep. Gregory W. Meeks, the ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the sponsor of Wednesday’s resolution, said ahead of the vote. ‘The American people are suffering. The cost of gas continues to go up, the cost of food and inflation keeps going up.’ ‘So it's been building and building,’ Meeks added. Wednesday’s vote was the House’s fourth on an Iran war powers resolution since the war started at the end of February, with each vote getting tighter than before. In the third vote last month, the measure was rejected 212-212.” [Congressional Quarterly, 6/3/26]
- GOP Leadership Delayed The Vote Through A Week-Long Recess When It Became Clear It Would Pass. According to Congressional Quarterly, “The House had originally been slated to vote on Meeks’ resolution before the Memorial Day recess. But when it became apparent the resolution was likely to be approved, particularly with a handful of Republican absences, GOP leadership yanked the vote from the schedule. Republicans could not delay the vote beyond Wednesday since the 1973 War Powers Resolution (PL 93-148) requires the House to vote within three legislative days of a measure being called up on the floor.” [Congressional Quarterly, 6/3/26]
- The Vote Came Amidst Ongoing Strikes Despite A Proclaimed Ceasefire With Iran Claiming It Was Suspending Talks Following An Israeli Incursion Of Lebanon. According to Congressional Quarterly, “The growing congressional angst over the war comes as an already fragile ceasefire appears increasingly tenuous and the Trump administration’s negotiations with Iran stumble. Early Wednesday morning, Iran launched a missile and drone attack at an airport in Kuwait, killing an Indian national and injuring dozens of other people, in what Tehran described as a response to U.S. strikes on Iran the night before. U.S. Central Command said Iran also targeted U.S. forces in Kuwait but that air defenses shot down the drones and ‘ensured no American personnel or assets were harmed.’ On Tuesday evening, Central Command said it conducted ‘self-defense strike’ on Iran’s Qeshm Island in response to Iran firing missiles and drones toward Kuwait and Bahrain. Hours earlier, Central Command also said U.S. forces fired a Hellfire missile into the engine room of a Botswana-flagged oil tanker that it alleged was trying to evade the U.S. blockade against Iranian ports. The exchange of fire comes amid on-again-off-again talks to end the war. On Monday, Iran said it was suspending talks with the United States in response to Israel’s incursion into Lebanon. But Trump maintained that talks are continuing despite Iran’s statement, posting on Truth Social on Tuesday that ‘the conversations between us have been going on continuously.’” [Congressional Quarterly, 6/3/26]
¶ May 2026: Mackenzie Voted Against Terminating Hostilities Against Iran Without A Declaration Of War
5/14/26: Mackenzie Voted Against Terminating Hostilities Against Iran Without A Declaration Of War. In May 2026, Mackenzie voted against, according to Congressional Quarterly, “the concurrent resolution that would direct the president to terminate the use of U.S. armed forces from hostilities against Iran unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or a specific authorization for use of military force against Iran. It would clarify that nothing in the measure could be construed to disrupt intelligence, counterintelligence or investigative activities.” The vote was on passage. The House rejected the resolution by a vote of 212 to 212. [House Vote 170, 5/14/26; Congressional Quarterly, 5/14/26; Congressional Actions, H.Con.Res. 75]
¶ April 2026: Mackenzie Voted Against Directing The President To Withdraw Troops From Iran Unless Authorized By Congress
4/16/26: Mackenzie Voted Against Directing The President To Withdraw Troops From Iran Unless Authorized By Congress. In April 2026, Mackenzie voted against, according to Congressional Quarterly, “the concurrent resolution that would direct the president to terminate the use of U.S. armed forces from hostilities against Iran unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force against Iran. The measure would exempt the use of U.S. armed forces that may be necessary to defend the U.S. or a U.S. ally or partner from imminent attack.” The vote was on passage. The House rejected the resolution by a vote of 213 to 214. [House Vote 114, 4/16/26; Congressional Quarterly, 4/16/26; Congressional Actions, H.Con.Res.40]
¶ March 2026: Mackenzie Voted Against Directing President Trump To Withdraw Troops From Iran
3/5/26: Mackenzie Voted Against Directing President Trump To Withdraw Troops From Iran. In March 2026, Mackenzie voted against, according to Congressional Quarterly, “the concurrent resolution that would direct the president to terminate the use of U.S. armed forces from hostilities against Iran or any part of its military, unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force against Iran.” The vote was on passage. The House rejected the concurrent resolution by a vote of 212 to 219. [House Vote 85, 3/5/26; Congressional Quarterly, 3/5/26; Congressional Actions, H.Con.Res.38]
¶ Trump’s War With Iran Was Costly For Pennsylvanians
HEADLINE: “The Impact Of The Iran War: Gas Prices, Food Costs Rise In Pennsylvania” [Penn Live Patriot-News, 4/21/26]
¶ Regular And Diesel Gas Prices Across Pennsylvania Soared As A Result Of The War
The Average Pennsylvania Household Spent An Estimated $372 More For Gas Since Trump’s War In Iran Began. According to Patch, “Pennsylvania drivers have collectively spent an estimated $1.75 billion more for gasoline since the war with Iran began Feb. 28, according to an analysis released by Democrats on Congress’ Joint Economic Committee. That works out to about $372 in additional gasoline spending for the average PA household, the committee estimated. Nationwide, Americans paid about $56.4 billion more for gasoline from Feb. 28 through July 12 than they would have if prices had remained at their prewar levels. The added cost averaged $477 per household, according to the analysis.” [Patch, 7/24/26]
- HEADLINE: “Americans’ Confidence In US Economy Falls As Iran Conflict Sends Gas Prices Higher” [ABC 27 News, 7/28/26]
July 2026: The National Average Price For A Gallon Of Gas Was Approaching $4 Again After Trump Declared A Ceasefire Was Over. According to Arizona’s Family, "Gas prices continue to inch up after President Donald Trump declared the ceasefire agreement with Iran was ‘over.’ AAA reported the average price for a gallon of regular gasoline was just shy of $4, at $3.98 a gallon. On Thursday, the average price of diesel was back up to about $5 a gallon. Oil and gas prices had been declining after the U.S. and Iran signed a peace plan to end the war in June." [Arizona’s Family, 7/17/26]
- The War In Iran Caused Fuel Inventories To Plunge To Historic Lows, Leading To A Major Surge In Gas Prices. According to the Washington Post, "Americans face a new round of punishing price increases for fuel and other products as oil and gas inventories plunge to historic lows around the world because of the war in Iran, energy executives and analysts warn. Fuel stocks are so low, experts said, that even an abrupt agreement between the United States and Iran and an immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz — through which one-fifth of the world’s oil and natural gas supplies passed before the war — may not stop fuel prices from soaring anew by the July Fourth holiday." [Washington Post, 6/3/26]
- HEADLINE: “Oil Prices Surge After Trump Vows Retaliation For Iranian Attack” [ABC News, 7/29/26]
7/29/26: Diesel Cost An Average Of $5.57 In Pennsylvania.
[AAA, Pennsylvania Fuel Prices, Viewed 7/29/26]
- HEADLINE: “Diesel Prices Surge In Pennsylvania As Iran Conflict Pushes Fuel Costs Higher” [WGAL, 3/9/26]
¶ Trump’s War With Iran Was Costing Pennsylvania Families At The Grocery Store
July 2026: Prices For Fresh Food, School Supplies, And Any Goods That Required Shipment Were Expected To Increase Amid Energy Price Increases Due To The United States’ War With Iran. According to PBS, “Already feeling pinched since the start of the Iran war, consumers are likely to feel more pain ahead as oil prices pushed past $100 a barrel Thursday amid renewed fighting and military strikes that have left global oil supplies stranded in the Middle East. The elevated price marked a turn from lower oil prices enjoyed briefly when hostilities between the U.S. and Iran waned in June. Brent crude, the international standard, last reached $100 a barrel in May. Companies that produce and sell fresh food, school supplies and anything that gets shipped using fuel reported cost impacts from an earlier spike in energy prices after the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran. They're likely to continue passing some of their increased expenses to consumers.” [PBS News, 7/24/26]
Tomatoes, Bananas, And Onions Experienced Major Price Hikes Since The Beginning Of The War. According to Fortune, "The U.S., Israel, and Iran agreed to a two-week ceasefire on Tuesday, but the sticker shock you’ve been feeling every time you go to the grocery store will get worse if the war continues. One of the first places you’ll feel it will be the produce aisle, experts say. A Fortune analysis of produce wholesale prices from USDA data found grocery-cart staples such as tomatoes, bananas, and yellow onions have experienced significant price spikes since the war began. The United Nations reported its global food price index rose by 2.4% in March, the second consecutive month of rising prices." [Fortune, 4/8/26]
- HEADLINE: "Higher Prices For Gas, Groceries And Flights Will Likely Outlast The Iran War" [AP News, 6/16/26]
¶ The War With Iran Cost U.S. Families $100 Billion So Far
As Of June 2026, The War In Iran Cost U.S. Families $100 Billion So Far. According to Fortune, "$750 a household—or $100 billion. This is the cost that Moody’s has calculated the Iran War has been so far to the U.S. consumer. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, said the cost passed on to households is the result of increased military spending and higher prices as a result of oil supply disruption out of the Middle East. Since the U.S. and Israel launched action against Iran—setting off a domino-effect of attacks across the Middle East—brent crude has topped $110 a barrel on multiple occasions." [Fortune, 6/2/26]
Americans, By A Margin Of 56 Percent To 7 Percent, Expected Trump’s War In Iran To Have A “Mostly Negative Impact” On Their Personal Financial Situation. According to The Washington Post, “Americans, by a margin of 56 percent to 7 percent, expect the war to have a ‘mostly negative impact’ on their personal financial situation, according to a March 31 Ipsos poll. A Middle East conflict that lasts for several more months would almost certainly spread higher prices and supply chain disruption beyond Asia and Europe to American shores. ‘I don’t think the U.S. will avoid it. These are global markets,’ said Rachel Ziemba, a New York-based analyst who advises corporations on geopolitical risk. ‘Experts, even a week ago, were worried. Now they are more worried.’” [Washington Post, 4/4/26]