2017: Schweikert Voted For The FY 2018 Republican Study Committee Budget Resolution Which In Part Called For Eliminating The National Endowment For The Arts. In October 2017, Schweikert voted for a budget resolution that would in part, according to Congressional Quarterly, "provide for $2.9 trillion in new budget authority in fiscal 2018. It would balance the budget by fiscal 2023 by reducing spending by $10.1 trillion over 10 years. It would cap total discretionary spending at $1.06 trillion for fiscal 2018 and would assume no separate Overseas Contingency Operations funding for fiscal 2018 or subsequent years and would incorporate funding related to war or terror into the base defense account. It would assume repeal of the 2010 health care overhaul and would convert Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program into a single block grant program. It would require that off budget programs, such as Social Security, the U.S. Postal Service, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, be included in the budget." The underlying legislation was an FY 2018 House GOP budget resolution. The House rejected the RSC budget by a vote of 139 to 281. [House Vote 555, 10/5/17; Congressional Quarterly, 10/5/17; Congressional Actions, H. Amdt. 455; Congressional Actions, H. Con. Res. 71]
2015: Schweikert Voted Against The FY 2016 Budget Resolution Which Called For The Elimination Of the Corporation For Public Broadcasting And The National Endowment For The Arts. In March 2015, Schweikert voted against the FY 2016 budget resolution which called for the elimination of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and the National Endowment for the Arts. According to Congressional Quarterly, the resolution called for the "eliminat[ion] [of] the Corporation for National and Community Service and ending federal funding of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and the National Endowments for the Arts and Humanities." The vote was on the budget resolution. The House passed the resolution 228 to 199. The budget resolution died in the Senate, but a similar concurrent resolution did pass both Houses. [House Vote 142, 3/25/15; Congressional Quarterly, 3/23/15; Congressional Actions, S. Con. Res. 11; Congressional Actions, H. Con. Res. 27]
2015: Schweikert Voted Against A FY 2016 Budget Resolution Which Called For The Elimination Of the Corporation For Public Broadcasting And The National Endowment For The Arts. In March 2015, Schweikert voted against a FY 2016 Budget Resolution which called for the elimination of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and the National Endowment for the Arts. According to Congressional Quarterly, the resolution called for the "eliminat[ion] [of] the Corporation for National and Community Service and ending federal funding of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and the National Endowments for the Arts and Humanities." The vote was on the adopting the substitute amendment. The House passed the amendment 219 to 208 and later passed the budget resolution. The budget resolution died in the Senate, but a similar concurrent resolution did pass both Houses. [House Vote 141, 3/25/15; Congressional Quarterly, 3/23/15; Congressional Actions, S. Con. Res. 11; Congressional Actions, H. Amdt. 86; Congressional Actions, H. Con. Res. 27]
2015: Schweikert Voted For A FY 2016 Budget Resolution Which Called For The Elimination Of the Corporation For Public Broadcasting And The National Endowment For The Arts. In March 2015, Schweikert voted for a FY 2016 Budget Resolution which called for the elimination of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and the National Endowment for the Arts. According to Congressional Quarterly, the resolution called for the "eliminat[ion] [of] the Corporation for National and Community Service and ending federal funding of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and the National Endowments for the Arts and Humanities." The vote was on the adopting the substitute amendment. The House rejected the amendment 105 to 319. The House later adopted a substitute amendment identical to this except for a change in defense spending and then later passed the budget resolution. The budget resolution died in the Senate, but a similar concurrent resolution did pass both Houses. [House Vote 140, 3/25/15; Congressional Quarterly, 3/23/15; Congressional Quarterly, 3/30/15; Congressional Actions, S. Con. Res. 11; Congressional Actions, H. Amdt. 85; Congressional Actions, H. Con. Res. 27]
2015: Schweikert Voted To Eliminate The National Endowment For The Arts As Part Of The FY 2016 Republican Study Committee Budget Resolution. In March 2015, Schweikert voted for eliminating the National Endowment for the Arts. According to the Republican Study Committee, "Eliminate the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities[.] The federal government should not be in the business of funding the arts. Support for the arts can easily and more properly be found from non-governmental sources. Eliminating the Endowment for the Arts would save taxpayers $146 million per year and eliminating the Endowment for the Humanities would save an additional $146 million per year." The underlying budget resolution would have, according to Congressional Quarterly, "provide[d] for $2.804 trillion in new budget authority in fiscal 2016, not including off-budget accounts. The substitute would call for reducing spending by $7.1 trillion over 10 years compared to the Congressional Budget Office baseline." The vote was on the substitute amendment to a Budget Resolution. The House rejected the amendment by a vote of 132 to 294. [House Vote 138, 3/25/15; Republican Study Committee, FY 2016 Budget; Congressional Quarterly, 3/25/15; Congress.gov, H. Amdt. 83; Congressional Actions, H. Con. Res. 27]
2013: Schweikert Voted To Eliminate The National Endowment For The Arts. In March 2013, Schweikert voted to support eliminating the National Endowment for the Arts, as part of the Republican Study Committee's proposed budget resolution covering fiscal years 2014 to 2023. According to the Republican Study Committee, the budget would "Eliminate the National Endowment for the Arts." The vote was on an amendment to the House budget resolution replacing the entire budget with the RSC's proposed budget; the amendment failed by a vote of 104 to 132 with 171 Democrats voting present. According to Congressional Quarterly, "Repeating a strategy from last year, 171 Democrats voted "present" to push Republicans to vote against the RSC plan to make sure it did not have enough support to replace the Ryan plan." [House Vote 86, 3/21/13; Republican Study Committee, 3/18/13; Congressional Quarterly, 3/25/13; Congressional Actions, H. Amdt. 35; Congressional Actions, H. Con. Res. 25]