đș - Click here for our Example Content Library
COMING SOON!đș - Click here for Notable Clips and Visuals
COMING SOON!¶ How To Win Against Stacy Garrity
As Stacy Garrity continuously called Pennsylvania "mediocre," Garrity demonstrated she would not fight for Pennsylvanians. Garrity supported Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill," which stripped health care from thousands of Pennsylvanians, set up future cuts to Medicare, cut SNAP benefits, and rescinded tax credits that experts warned would increase energy costs for Pennsylvanians. She supported Trumpâs disastrous tariffs that harmed small businesses and increased prices for Pennsylvanians. Garrity praised Trumpâs DOGE while Social Security lines grew, funding cuts threatened universities, farmers, and food banks, and Pennsylvania workers were laid off. Garrity posed a threat to Pennsylvaniansâ reproductive freedoms with her anti-abortion extremism. Garrity denied the 2020 election results, opposed Pennsylvaniaâs mail-in voting system, and would allow Trump to overreach his authority and send federal forces against Pennsylvanians. Stacy Garrity, who was "honored" to receive Trump's endorsement, would leave Pennsylvania vulnerable to Trumpâs attacks.
¶ GARRITY SUPPORTED DEVASTATING HEALTH CARE CUTS
- In 2025, Garrity supported Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill," which is estimated to kick 17 million Americans off their health insurance, including nearly 12 million Americans who rely on Medicaid. While Garrity praised the bill as a âhistoric plan,â more than 451,000 Pennsylvanians could lose their health insurance as a result of the bill. More than 496,000 Pennsylvanians were enrolled in Affordable Care Act Marketplace health insurance plans.
- Garrity suggested Pennsylvaniaâs government should replicate the Medicaid restrictions imposed under Trumpâs tax bill, even though Medicaid expansion enabled coverage for more Pennsylvanians. More than 300,000 Medicaid recipients in Pennsylvania were expected to lose their coverage due to Trumpâs tax bill.
Message: Garrity supported ripping away health care from thousands of Pennsylvanians to fund tax cuts for the wealthy.
¶ GARRITY SUPPORTED MASSIVE CUTS TO MEDICARE
- In 2025, Garrity supported Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill," which the Congressional Budget Office estimated would trigger nearly $500 billion in cuts to Medicare absent future congressional action.
Message: Garrity supported making massive cuts to health care services seniors rely on.
¶ GARRITY SUPPORTED TRUMPâS DEVASTATING TARIFFS
- In 2025, Garrity supported Trumpâs tariffs, which were dooming Pennsylvanians to a trade war and rising prices.
- Garrity even recognized that Trumpâs tariffs would increase prices. Tariffs are contributing to higher food prices and are hurting Pennsylvania small businesses and families. In February 2026, Garrity did not respond to a request for comment after Trade Partnership Worldwide published a report that showed Trump's tariffs cost Pennsylvanians $4 billion in 2025. Despite this, Garrity called Trumpâs tariffs "common sense measures," even as the U.S. stock market crashed due to Trumpâs escalating global trade war.
Message: Garrity supported Trumpâs disastrous tariffs that harmed Pennsylvania small businesses and ensured Pennsylvanians will pay more for groceries.
¶ GARRITY SUPPORTED STRIPPING SNAP BENEFITS FROM PENNSYLVANIA FAMILIES
- In January 2026, Garrity said she opposed Pennsylvaniaâs lawsuit seeking to restore $13 million in federal funding for Pennsylvania farmers and food banks, and claimed too many Pennsylvanians were receiving SNAP assistance. In 2025, the Trump administration rescinded funding for a program that provided aid to states to purchase food from farms to stock food banks.
- In 2025, Garrity supported Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill, which made the largest cut to SNAP in history. Garrity praised the legislation as a âhistoric plan,â claiming the bill would cut âwasteful spending.â In Pennsylvania, nearly 2 million Pennsylvanians relied on SNAP to afford groceries.
Message: Garrity supported making food more expensive for Pennsylvanians.
¶ GARRITY STOOD BY WHILE TRUMP ATTACKED SOCIAL SECURITY AND FIRED HARD-WORKING PENNSYLVANIANS
- In 2025, Garrity praised Trumpâs âDepartment of Government Efficiencyâ as DOGE-driven cuts and downsizing were affecting the federal governmentâs ability to deliver services to seniors. Nearly 3 million Pennsylvanians relied on Social Security benefits.
- Garrity promoted DOGE even though it resulted in federal funding cuts to Pennsylvania agencies and universities, and impacted food banks and farmers. Garrity supported DOGE cuts as Trump threatened the livelihoods of approximately 75,000 federal workers in Pennsylvania.
Message: While Social Security lines grew and Pennsylvania workers were laid off, Garrity did nothing to help them.
¶ GARRITY Suppported Increases To Energy Costs In Pennsylvania
- In 2025, Garrity supported Trumpâs âOne Big Beautiful Bill,â which repealed clean energy tax credits. According to experts, the repeal of the clean energy tax credits would cause electricity costs to increase in Pennsylvania. Energy Innovation warned the new federal law was expected to decrease Pennsylvaniaâs generation capacity, raise wholesale electricity costs by $2 billion in 2035, and increase energy bills for Pennsylvanian households: $130 annually by 2030 and $160 by 2035. Center for American Progress warned the law was also expected to increase Pennsylvaniansâ gasoline spending by $110 annually by 2030, raise costs for replacing heating, ventilation, and air conditioning units by $2,000, and increase costs to upgrade windows and insulation by $1,200.
Message: Garrity supported raising energy bills in Pennsylvania to give tax cuts to the wealthy.
¶ GARRITY WAS AN ANTI-ABORTION EXTREMIST
- Although she tried to soften her tone on abortion, Garrity was an out-of-touch anti-abortion extremist.
- Garrity celebrated the overturning of Roe v. Wade and claimed it âwas wrong from the beginning.â Garrity supported defunding Planned Parenthood and previously sold anti-abortion campaign merchandise. While Garrity claimed she no longer wanted to talk abortion, she previously said, âWhatâs really dangerous to families and freedom is aborting babies and packing the Supreme Court.â
Message: Garrity threatened the reproductive freedoms of Pennsylvanians.
¶ GARRITY WAS A THREAT TO THE VOTING RIGHTS OF PENNSYLVANIANS
- Garrity was an election denier who opposed mail-in ballots, except for when Republicans used them. Although Garrity tried to walk back her election denialism, Garrity claimed Trump won the 2020 election and spoke at a rally one day before the January 6 insurrection to cast doubt on the 2020 election results.
- While Garrity claimed she did not like mail-in ballots and said Trump had a âlegitimate concernâ over voter fraud, she also touted Republicans âstepping upâ in embracing mail-in voting.
- In February 2026, Garrity publicly admitted she would cooperate with the Trump administration in administering Pennsylvania elections, even as Trump called for Republicans to ânationalizeâ elections and âtake over the voting.â
Message: Garrity was an election denier and posed a threat to the voting rights of Pennsylvanians.
¶ GARRITY WOULD NOT PROTECT PENNSYLVANIANS FROM TRUMPâS Federal Forces OVERREACH
-
Garrity repeatedly signaled she would allow Trump to overstep his authority and deploy federal forces against Pennsylvanians. In September 2025, Garrity said she would be open to Trump sending federal forces and National Guard troops against Philadelphia residents. In February 2026, when asked how she would handle a surge of protests over federal immigration operations in Pennsylvania, Garrity called for local cooperation with federal immigration and claimed anti-ICE demonstrators were âwell-coordinatedâ âpaid protestors.â
-
In December 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Trump did not have the authority to deploy National Guard troops in Chicago. Despite this ruling, Trump suggested he would ânot hesitate to deploy troops in the future.â
-
The Trump administration faced repeated legal challenges for overstepping its authority in deploying federal forces without the consent of governors and mayors across several American cities. In January 2026, Minnesota and Illinois sued the Trump administration over its deployment of federal agents to Twin Cities and Chicago for immigration operations, arguing the unprecedented deployment of federal officers was a âfederal invasionâ and unconstitutional violation of the Tenth Amendment.
Message: Garrity would allow Trump to overreach his authority and send federal forces against Pennsylvanians.
¶ Issue Back-Ups
¶ Stacy Garrity's Policies Have Hurt Everyday People
| Garrity Supported Efforts To Cut Medicaid And Threaten Pennsylvaniansâ Access To Health Care
| Garrity Supported Medicare Cuts
| Garrity Backed Trump's Tariffs, Endangering Pennsylvania's Economy
| Garrity Supported Stripping SNAP Benefits From Pennsylvania Families
| Garrity Won't Defend Pennsylvaniansâ Jobs Or Social Security From Trump
| Garrity Supported Increases To Energy Costs In Pennsylvania
| Garrity Was An Anti-Abortion Extremist
| Garrity Would Not Protect Pennsylvanians From Trumpâs Federal Forces Overreach