¶ Overview
In 2026, Guzmán Fralick made “securing elections” a main priority of her attorney general campaign, and specifically wanted to pass the “SAVE Nevada Act” to replicate Trump’s “SAVE America Act.” Guzmán Fralick pushed for election reforms that included eliminating automatic voter registration and mail-in voter registration, ending universal mail-in voting, implementing voter ID requirements and proof of citizenship for voter registration, and counting all ballots on election day.
Despite her focus on election security, Guzmán Fralick criticized her Democratic counterparts’ efforts to ensure free and fair elections in Nevada. Guzmán Fralick said she thought Attorney General Aaron Ford pursued legal action against fake electors in the 2020 presidential election “too aggressively,” and was not sure if it was “worth spending the resources and the time.” When Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar expressed concern over the U.S. Supreme Court changing mail-in voting rules during an election year and how they would inform voters of last-minute changes, Guzmán Fralick called him a hypocrite because Democrats changed the rules during an election year in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Guzmán Fralick also accused Aguilar of retaliating against her because of her positions on election reform. After Aguilar announced the Secretary of State’s office had accidentally published her private information on their website, Guzmán suggested the information was published on purpose and questioned the office’s ability to keep elections secure.
¶ Guzmán Fralick Made Election Reform A Main Priority Of Her Campaign
¶ Guzmán Fralick Wanted To Pass The SAVE Nevada Act, Which Mirrored Trump’s SAVE America Act
¶ Guzmán Fralick Supported Election Reforms That Restricted Voter Registration Methods And Mail-In Voting
2026: Guzmán Fralick Said She Would Work With The Legislature To Pass The SAVE Nevada Act, Which Would “Prevent Illegals From Ever Being Registered Again, Eliminate Automatic Voter Registration, And End Universal Mail-In Ballots.” According to Adriana Guzmán Fralick for Attorney General, “Securing Our Elections Nevadans deserve the safest and most secure elections. Adriana will ensure that no illegal immigrants are registered to vote and will prosecute any cases of voter fraud. Working with our legislature, Adriana will seek the passage of the SAVE Nevada Act. This legislation would mirror President Trump’s SAVE America Act and would: Have all ballots counted on election day, Remove all non-citizens from our voter rolls, Enact safeguards in the voter registration process to prevent illegals from ever being registered again, Eliminate automatic voter registration, and End universal mail-in ballots.”
[Adriana Guzmán Fralick For Attorney General, Issues, Archived 3/8/26]
Guzmán Fralick Pledged To “Push For The SAVE Nevada Act,” Which Would “Remove Non-Citizens From Our Voter Rolls, Count All Ballots On Election Day, And End Universal Mail-In Voting.” According to Guzmán Fralick’s Twitter, “President Trump is fighting for secure elections — but DC keeps dragging its feet. As your AG, I will push for the SAVE Nevada Act to remove non-citizens from our voter rolls, count all ballots on Election Day, & end universal mail-in voting. What DC won't finish, Nevada will.”
[Twitter, @AdrianaForNV, 3/16/26]
Guzmán Fralick Said She Would Take “A More Aggressive Approach” To Election Fraud And Supported The SAVE Act, Which “Would Require Proof Of Citizenship To Register To Vote And Eliminate Mail-Only Registration.” According to the Nevada Independent, “"Central to both candidates' campaigns is a pledge to investigate election fraud. While the public reports allegations of election law violations to the secretary of state's office, cases can be referred to the attorney general's office for prosecution. Since the 2022 election, the attorney general's office has received 26 cases for potential prosecution, including one man who was found to have voted in Arizona and Nevada. He avoided jail time as part of a plea deal. Both candidates stopped short of saying there is widespread fraud in Nevada elections — there is no evidence to support it — but they said the attorney general's office has not done enough to assuage people's concerns over elections. [...] Guzmán Fralick, who said her trust in state election officials has wavered after her personal information was posted online, also pledged a more aggressive approach. ‘They have been reactive and not proactive,’ she said. Guzmán Fralick also supports the SAVE Act, the GOP-backed bill in Congress that would require proof of citizenship to register to vote and eliminate mail-only registration.” [Nevada Independent, 4/22/26]
¶ Guzmán Fralick Pushed For Voter ID Requirements And “Cleaning Up The Voter Rolls”
Guzmán Fralick Said One Of Her Main Priorities Was Election Integrity And Wanted To Implement Voter ID Requirements And “Cleaning Up The Voter Rolls.” According to 2 News Nevada, “She told us her two main priorities if elected. The first is more protections for children. ‘When some of these lawsuits involve social media, making sure there are guardrails for children and to prevent the exploitation of children,’ Guzman Fralick said. Election integrity is the other one. ‘It also depends on what happens with voter ID,’ she said. ‘I think if that passes in November, then we need to make sure we implement that. As well as cleaning up the voter rolls.’” [2 News Nevada, 4/21/26]
¶ Guzmán Fralick Criticized Nevada Democrats’ Efforts To Ensure Free And Fair Elections
¶ Guzmán Fralick Said Attorney General Aaron Ford Pursued Legal Action Against Fake Electors “Too Aggressively”
¶ Guzmán Fralick Said She Was Not Sure If Pursuing The Fake Electors Was “Worth Spending The Resources And The Time”
May 2026: Guzmán Fralick Said She Thought Attorney General Aaron Ford Pursued Legal Action Against Fake Electors “Too Aggressively,” And Would Need To See The Evidence To Determine “If It’s Worth Spending The Resources And The Time.” According to the Reno Gazette Journal, “Is there a type of lawsuit or legal action you believe the current attorney general has pursued too aggressively - or not aggressively enough? · Guzman Fralick: Maybe too aggressively would probably be the fake electors. But not really having all the evidence in front of me, I can't really be sure. I would have to go in there and do a balancing test and say, 'What evidence do we have?' because the standard is intent and that's hard to prove unless you've got some really good physical, demonstrative evidence. That's something I would definitely want to look at to see if it's worth spending the resources and the time because I know that there are so many other things that really need attention and that are more central to Nevada and the residents of Nevada.” [Reno Gazette Journal, 5/7/26]
¶ Guzmán Fralick Dismissed Secretary Of State Cisco Aguilar’s Concerns About The Supreme Court Potentially Changing Mail-In Voting Rules During An Election Year
Guzmán Fralick Said It Was Hypocritical Of Aguilar To Oppose The Supreme Court Making Changes To Mail-In Voting During An Election Year Because Democrats Changed Election Rules In 2020 To Accommodate COVID-19 Pandemic Restrictions. According to Guzmán Fralick’s Twitter, “NV SOS: ‘To change the rules of the game in the middle of the competition does not do anyone any good’ I guess he must have forgotten about Democrats using Covid to change the rules in the middle of the election. Give me a break”
[Twitter, @AdrianaForNV, 3/24/26]
- Aguilar Said He Was Concerned About The Supreme Court Ruling Against Counting Mail Ballots That Arrive After Election Day Because “The Challenge Is Educating Voters Shortly Before The Election How The Election Is Going To Work.” According to the Las Vegas Review Journal, “As he left the chambers of the U.S. Supreme Court, where justices had just heard arguments Monday over whether to prevent states from counting mail ballots that arrive after Election Day, Nevada Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar texted his staff 3,000 miles away. His directive: Get ready to plan how to run November’s midterm elections if the high court changes the rules when it issues its decision in June. ‘The challenge is educating voters shortly before the election how the election is going to work,’ Aguilar, a Democrat, said. ‘That doesn’t happen overnight. The election planning happens long before.’ [...] Aguilar said he expects his office and local election officials in Nevada will roll with the punches, but he is concerned about a disruptive ruling. ‘To change the rules of the game in the middle of the competition does not do anyone any good,’ he said.” [Las Vegas Review Journal, 3/24/26]
¶ Guzmán Fralick Accused The Nevada Secretary Of State Of Retaliating Against Her Calls For Election Reform
¶ Guzmán Fralick Accused Aguilar Of Posting Her Personal Information On The Secretary Of State Website Because She Supported Election Reforms
April 2026: Guzmán Fralick Accused The Secretary Of State’s Office Of Purposefully Posting Her Personal Information On Their Website. According to the Reno Gazette Journal, “Adriana Guzman Fralick - a Republican running for attorney general - said a voter notified her campaign that the secretary of state's website posted the front and back of her driver's license online, including her home address, for anyone to see. 'This is a serious breach of the public's trust in the secretary of state's office,' she said in a statement. Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar 'wants Nevadans to believe our elections are secure and fair, but he can't even secure my personal information,' Guzman Fralick said.” [Reno Gazette Journal, 4/8/26]
- Guzmán Fralick Claimed The Secretary Of State Posted Her Information In Retaliation For Her Calls To Remove “Non-Citizens From Voter Rolls,” Eliminate “Automatic Voter Registration,” And End “Universal Mail-In Ballots.” According to the Reno Gazette Journal, “Guzman Fralick's campaign calls for removing non-citizens from voter rolls, eliminating automatic voter registration and ending universal mail-in ballots. She suggested the posting of her personal information was not accidental. 'Voters and public ethics officials alike will have to consider the facts involved: I publicly called for election reforms, and thereafter my personal information is out in the public,' she said.” [Reno Gazette Journal, 4/8/26]
¶ Aguilar Said Guzmán Fralick’s Personal Information Was Posted Due To Human Error
Aguilar Said Guzmán Fralick’s Personal Information Was Posted Due To Human Error, Not A Systemic Problem, And Said The “Information Was Removed As Soon As We Became Aware.”
According to the Reno Gazette Journal, “That information was removed as soon as we became aware, and I called the candidate directly,' he said in a statement. 'I understand the potential ramifications that a mistake like this can have, and I apologized and offered any support that I can to help protect her privacy. [...] Aguilar, a Democrat running for reelection, said the problem has been fixed. 'We have identified and corrected this issue internally, which transparently was a result of human error and not indicative of a systemic problem,' he said. 'My office takes the security of data and personal information very seriously and will continue to follow up and provide as much support as possible.” [Reno Gazette Journal, 4/8/26]